Download A4Medicine Mobile App
Empower Your RCGP AKT Journey: Master the MCQs with Us! 🚀
Penicillin allergy is one of the most commonly reported drug allergies worldwide and represents a significant public health concern. In the United States and other regions, prevalence rates in the general population have been reported to range from 9% to 12%, with figures reaching up to 15% among hospitalized patients (Steenvoorden et al., 2021; Sacco et al., 2017). It is important to note that these prevalence numbers can vary slightly across studies due to differences in study populations, diagnostic criteria, and methodologies. The table provided summarizes key clinical messages about penicillin allergy management; however, readers should be aware that specific prevalence figures might differ somewhat depending on the literature referenced.
Despite its high reported prevalence, a substantial majority of individuals labeled as penicillin allergic do not have a true allergy. Current evidence suggests that over 90% of patients with a documented penicillin allergy are actually tolerant when evaluated using appropriate testing methods (Snider et al., 2022; Baghdady & Alothmany, 2023). This mislabeling can lead to the unnecessary avoidance of penicillin and other beta-lactam antibiotics—agents that are often the most effective treatment options for a variety of bacterial infections (Penicillin allergy—getting the label right, 2017; Pongdee & Li, 2018).
The clinical implications of an inaccurate penicillin allergy label are profound. Patients erroneously identified as allergic tend to receive broad-spectrum antibiotics, which contributes to increased antibiotic resistance, higher morbidity, and elevated healthcare costs (Lozo et al., 2023). Additionally, the economic burden is significant, with studies showing that these patients often experience longer hospital stays and complications related to the use of less effective alternative antibiotics (Li et al., 2014; Desai et al., 2017).
Clinical Aspect | Key Message / Details | Management / Recommendations |
---|---|---|
Epidemiology & Impact | Penicillin is implicated in up to 20% of drug-related anaphylaxis deaths in Europe and up to 75% in the US. It accounts for 0.7–10% of all anaphylaxis cases. Only 1–10% of self-reported penicillin allergies are confirmed as IgE-mediated on testing. Being labeled as penicillin allergic is associated with longer hospital stays, increased antibiotic resistance, and higher healthcare costs. | Confirm true allergy through specialist testing when appropriate. Avoid unnecessary labeling to reduce adverse outcomes and healthcare burden. |
Risk Factors | Increased risk (↑) in patients aged 20–49 and in females. Concurrent infection and a past reaction (lower risk (↓) if the last reaction was >15 years ago). | Obtain a detailed history to assess individual risk profiles. Recognize high-risk groups to guide further evaluation and management. |
Sensitization | Repeated courses of penicillin are more likely to cause sensitization than a single dose. | Consider the cumulative exposure history when evaluating a patient’s allergy status. |
History Taking | A thorough history should document the specific drug, timing of onset, and resolution of symptoms. | Essential for differentiating between immediate and non-immediate reactions and for guiding subsequent investigations. |
Immediate (IgE-mediated) Reactions | Typically occur within minutes to up to 6 hours (usually within 1 hour) after drug administration. Clinical features include anaphylaxis, urticaria, angioedema, wheezing, and laryngeal oedema. Can occur up to 4 days into the course. | Prompt recognition and urgent management of anaphylaxis. Detailed evaluation to confirm allergy and determine safe future use. |
Non-Immediate Reactions | Occur 60 minutes to several days after the last dose. Can be mediated by non-IgE mechanisms, including cytotoxic reactions (blood disorders), immune complex reactions (serum sickness 3–4 weeks after treatment starts), and T cell–mediated delayed reactions (rashes). | Management strategies may differ from immediate reactions. Detailed history and specialized testing may help differentiate these reactions. |
Maculopapular Rashes | Occur in up to 10% of patients exposed to aminopenicillins, with the incidence increasing in the presence of viral infections (notably 70–90% in patients with EBV or HPV). | Consider the role of viral infections in rash etiology; carefully evaluate before labeling a patient as allergic. |
Cephalosporin Reactions & Cross-reactivity | Adverse reactions to cephalosporins are about 10 times lower than with penicillin. Cross-reactivity: up to 10% with first-generation cephalosporins and 2–3% with third-generation agents; approximately 2% of cephalosporin-allergic patients react to penicillin. Cross-reactivity is less frequent in non-immediate reactions. | Avoid cephalosporins in patients with a clear history of penicillin allergy (especially for immediate reactions). Consider alternative antibiotics or evaluate cross-reactivity risk based on cephalosporin generation and reaction type. |
Indications for Specialist Testing | Indicated in patients with multiple drug allergies, those requiring frequent antibiotic courses (e.g., CF, diabetes, bronchiectasis, immunodeficiencies), when there is no suitable alternative antibiotic, or when anaphylaxis occurs under general anaesthesia with multiple drugs. | Refer to a drug allergy clinic for a detailed evaluation in an experienced hospital setting. |
Allergy Investigations | Testing involves skin prick tests, intradermal tests, and occasionally patch testing with penicillin, amoxicillin, and the index drug. Approximately one-third of patients with a reported penicillin allergy have negative skin tests. Available IgE blood tests for beta‑lactams have low sensitivity and should be reserved for specific circumstances. | Use a graduated (incremental) drug challenge when skin tests are negative and it is deemed safe. Ensure testing is conducted under experienced supervision. |
Current Recommendations & Patient Safety | In cases of a clear history of allergic reaction, current advice is to avoid all penicillins and cephalosporins. Patients should be aware of their allergy status. | Advise patients to wear an alert bracelet and ensure that drug allergy alerts are clearly documented in their medical records. |
A key part of this process is the formation of haptens. Penicillin itself is too small to trigger an immune response until it binds to proteins in the body, forming larger complexes (neoantigens) that the immune system recognizes as foreign. Additionally, because of structural similarities (especially in the R1 side chain), some patients allergic to penicillin may also react to other beta-lactam antibiotics such as cephalosporin.
In summary, the mechanism of penicillin allergy is complex and involves a combination of IgE-mediated and non-IgE-mediated pathways, the formation of haptens, genetic predisposition, and cross-reactivity with other antibiotics. Understanding these mechanisms is crucial for the accurate diagnosis and management of penicillin allergy, which can significantly impact antibiotic prescribing practices and patient safety.
In summary, while penicillin allergy remains a commonly reported condition, a critical reassessment of this label can have far-reaching implications. Improved diagnostic accuracy not only ensures that patients receive the most effective antibiotic therapies but also mitigates broader public health concerns such as antibiotic resistance and increased healthcare expenditures.
(2017). Penicillin allergy—getting the label right. Drug and Therapeutics Bulletin, 55(3), 33-36.
https://doi.org/10.1136/dtb.2017.3.0463
Baghdady, N. and Alothmany, H. (2023). Describing self-reported penicillin allergy using a penicillin allergy risk tool (PEN-FAST) in an outpatient setting at a tertiary hospital in Saudi Arabia. Cureus.
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.51322
Balaha, M., Ahmed, N., Alonazi, F., & Alshehri, S. (2021). A survey of health care professionals’ knowledge and practice toward penicillin allergy. Journal of Pharmaceutical Research International, 1-5.
https://doi.org/10.9734/jpri/2021/v33i51a33460
Desai, S., Kaplan, M., Chen, Q., & Macy, E. (2017). Morbidity in pregnant women associated with unverified penicillin allergies, antibiotic use, and group B streptococcus infections. The Permanente Journal, 21(1).
https://doi.org/10.7812/tpp/16-080
Li, M., Krishna, M., Razaq, S., & Pillay, D. (2014). A real-time prospective evaluation of clinical pharmaco-economic impact of diagnostic label of ‘penicillin allergy’ in a UK teaching hospital. Journal of Clinical Pathology, 67(12), 1088-1092.
https://doi.org/10.1136/jclinpath-2014-202438
Lozo, S., Wagner, D., Shah, N., Goldberg, R., Gafni‐Kane, A., & Solomonides, A. (2023). Should penicillin allergy testing be included as part of preoperative testing? Journal for Healthcare Quality, 45(5), 255-260.
https://doi.org/10.1097/jhq.0000000000000395
Maduemem, K., Clark, H., Sohal, I., Dawson, T., & Makwana, N. (2022). Barriers to paediatric penicillin allergy de-labelling in UK secondary care: a regional survey. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 108(5), 363-366.
https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2022-324564
Pongdee, T. and Li, J. (2018). Evaluation and management of penicillin allergy. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 93(1), 101-107.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2017.09.020
Sacco, K., Bates, A., Brigham, T., Imam, J., & Burton, M. (2017). Clinical outcomes following inpatient penicillin allergy testing: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Allergy, 72(9), 1288-1296.
https://doi.org/10.1111/all.13168
Savic, L., Ardern‐Jones, M., Avery, A., Cook, T., Denman, S., Farooque, S., … & Warner, A. (2022). BSACI guideline for the set‐up of penicillin allergy de‐labelling services by non‐allergists working in a hospital setting. Clinical & Experimental Allergy, 52(10), 1135-1141.
https://doi.org/10.1111/cea.14217
Snider, J., Mithal, L., Kwah, J., Rhodes, N., & Son, M. (2022). Antibiotic choice for group B streptococcus prophylaxis in mothers with documented penicillin allergies and associated newborn outcomes.
https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.07.25.22277992
Steenvoorden, L., Bjoernestad, E., Kvesetmoen, T., & Gulsvik, A. (2021). De-labelling penicillin allergy in acutely hospitalized patients: a pilot study. BMC Infectious Diseases, 21(1).
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-021-06794-1
Trubiano, J., Smibert, O., Douglas, A., Devchand, M., Lambros, B., Holmes, N., … & Slavin, M. (2018). The safety and efficacy of an oral penicillin challenge program in cancer patients: a multicenter pilot study. Open Forum Infectious Diseases, 5(12).
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy306
BSACI. (2020). Management of allergy to penicillins and other beta-lactams: PC summary.
https://www.bsaci.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Management-of-allergy-to-penicillins-and-other-beta-PC-summary-2020-JH-CW-FINAL.pdf
Dai, R., Niu, Z., Yang, Y., Liu, X., & Zhang, B. (2024). Case report: drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) induced by ceftazidime in a connective tissue disease (CTD) patient. Frontiers in Pharmacology, 15.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2024.1403390
Han, J., Yi, Y., Li, C., Zhang, Y., Wang, L., Zhao, Y., … & Liang, A. (2016). Involvement of histamine and RhoA/ROCK in penicillin immediate hypersensitivity reactions. Scientific Reports, 6(1).
https://doi.org/10.1038/srep33192
Krebs, K., Bovijn, J., Zheng, N., Lepamets, M., Censin, J., Jürgenson, T., … & Zare, A. (2020). Genome-wide study identifies association between HLA-B∗55:01 and self-reported penicillin allergy. The American Journal of Human Genetics, 107(4), 612-621.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2020.08.008
Mahamid, A., Wainstock, T., Sheiner, E., Rosenberg, E., Kluwgant, D., & Pariente, G. (2022). Perinatal outcome and long‐term infectious hospitalizations of offspring born to women with known drug allergy. American Journal of Reproductive Immunology, 88(5).
https://doi.org/10.1111/aji.13608
Meng, X., Jenkins, R., Berry, N., Maggs, J., Farrell, J., Lane, C., … & Park, B. (2011). Direct evidence for the formation of diastereoisomeric benzylpenicilloyl haptens from benzylpenicillin and benzylpenicillenic acid in patients. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, 338(3), 841-849.
https://doi.org/10.1124/jpet.111.183871
Montañez, M., Mayorga, C., Torres, M., Ariza, A., Blanca, M., & Pérez‐Inestrosa, E. (2011). Synthetic approach to gain insight into antigenic determinants of cephalosporins: in vitro studies of chemical structure−IgE molecular recognition relationships. Chemical Research in Toxicology, 24(5), 706-717.
https://doi.org/10.1021/tx100446g
Nicoletti, P., Carr, D., Barrett, S., McEvoy, L., Friedmann, P., Shear, N., … & Pirmohamed, M. (2021). Beta-lactam-induced immediate hypersensitivity reactions: a genome-wide association study of a deeply phenotyped cohort. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 147(5), 1830-1837.e15.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2020.10.004
Pichler, W. and Hausmann, O. (2016). Classification of drug hypersensitivity into allergic, p-i, and pseudo-allergic forms. International Archives of Allergy and Immunology, 171(3-4), 166-179.
https://doi.org/10.1159/000453265
Shenoy, E., Macy, E., Rowe, T., & Blumenthal, K. (2019). Evaluation and management of penicillin allergy. JAMA, 321(2), 188.
https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.19283
Wang, D., Han, J., Pan, C., Li, C., Zhao, Y., Liu, S., … & Liang, A. (2022). Penilloic acid is the chief culprit involved in non-IgE mediated, immediate penicillin-induced hypersensitivity reactions in mice. Frontiers in Pharmacology, 13.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2022.874486